NAAC

Criteria 2 Teaching- Learning and Evaluation

 

Metric No2.1 Student Enrollment and ProfileDownload
2.1.1Average percentage of students from other States and Countries during the last five years
2.1.2Average Enrollment percentage (Average of last five years)
2.1.3Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories as per applicable reservation policy during last five years
Metric No2.2. Catering to Student DiversityDownload
2.2.1The institution assesses the learning levels of the students, after admission and organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners
2.2.2Student- Full time teacher ratio (current year data) 
2.2.3Percentage of differently abled students (Divyangjan) on rolls (current year data) 
Metric No2.3. Teaching- Learning ProcessDownload
2.3.1Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences
2.3.2Percentage of teachers using ICT for effective teaching with Learning Management Systems (LMS), E-Learning resources etc. (current year data)
2.3.3Ratio of students to mentor for academic and stress related issues (current year data)
2.3.4Innovation and Creativity in teaching- learning
Metric No2.4 Teacher Profile and QualityDownload
2.4.1Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
2.4.2Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. during the last five years
2.4.3Teaching experience of full time teachers in number of years(current year data) 
2.4.4Percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowship at State, National, International level from government, recognised bodies during last five years
2.4.5Average percentage of full time teachers from other States against sanctioned posts during the last five years
Metric No2.5. Evaluation Process and ReformsDownload
2.5.1Reforms in Continuous Internal Evaluation (CIE) System at the Institutional level
2.5.2Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and variety
2.5.3Mechanism to deal with examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient
2.5.4The Institution adheres to the academic calendar for the conduct of CIE
Metric No2.6 Student Performance and Learning OutcomeDownload
2.6.1Programme outcomes, Programme specific outcomes and course outcomes for all Programme offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students.
2.6.2Attainment of Programme outcomes, Programme specific outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution. 
2.6.3Average pass percentage of Students (Current year data)
Metric No2.7 Student Satisfaction SurveyDownload
2.7.1Online student satisfaction survey regarding teaching learning process 
Metric NoDVVDownload
2.1.2Number of students admitted year-wise during the last five years
2.3.22.3.2.1. Number of teachers using ICT
2.4.4Percentage of full time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowship at State, National, International level from government, recognised bodies during last five years